home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: informatik.tu-muenchen.de!fischerj
- From: fischerj@informatik.tu-muenchen.de (Juergen "Rally" Fischer)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer
- Subject: Re: OS3 Double Buffering
- Date: 17 Jan 1996 18:50:29 GMT
- Organization: Technische Universitaet Muenchen, Germany
- Distribution: world
- Message-ID: <4djgdl$3qv@sunsystem5.informatik.tu-muenchen.de>
- References: <thst.02fb@outsite.saar.de> <4d3fhk$2j1@oreig.uji.es> <1996Jan12.155405.4019@imada.ou.dk> <4ddgu4$7ne@serpens.rhein.de>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: hphalle5.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
- Originator: fischerj@hphalle5.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
-
-
- In article <4ddgu4$7ne@serpens.rhein.de>, mlelstv@serpens.rhein.de (Michael van Elst) writes:
- |> breese@imada.ou.dk (Bjorn Reese) writes:
- |>
- |> >Called once per frame, you won't notice the difference between the
- |> >two functions.
- |>
- |> Ah... pure c0d3r style argumentation. But why do you use OS functions ?
-
- So if you assume a c0d3r talking, why wont you use the
- c0d3r-claim-translator ? :)
- That tanslates to "Called once per frame, you won't notice the
- difference >in speed< between the two functions." ;)
-
- Or is this also false ?
-
- |> --
- |> Michael van Elst
- |>
- |> Internet: mlelstv@serpens.rhein.de
- |> "A potential Snark may lurk in every tree."
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
- fischerj@Informatik.TU-Muenchen.DE (Juergen "Rally" Fischer) =:)
-
-